Christians hate . hate church. Islam hate . religious hatred. hatred. hatred. hatred. Everywhere there is hatred . Wherever you look.
At least when you look into the minds of quite a few believers.
Sun is the least popular and frequently used charge given to us poor and certainly not as a rule-hating atheists. But maybe I should emphasize that again. While there are quite a few properties of the faith and its representatives that bring me up the wall. Here is a representative the degrading bondage of the faithful to their God (or Gods) mentioned. But I do not really hate. Neither the Christians nor the Muslims nor Hindus, Jews, and yet in my experience is similar for most of the committed atheists.
The question is then to identify why the believer thinks so much hatred, when there are to see any. Certainly he is skilled at things (Sinn!) to perceive where there are none. But why the hatred and even in us atheists? Where does all the hate?
course of believers themselves
But wait. Before one accuses me of simply projecting and argumentative side with throwing grenades at me you should at least know my reasoning.
, imagine, then, looking deeply and sincerely believes in something completely nonsensical or silly (God, homeopathy, the intellectual honesty of a Püttmann ). It has built its identity on this ridiculous and is perhaps even diffuse aware that this base is really ridiculous. Then comes in so therefore a skeptical man and dares to call the ridiculous look ridiculous. That hurt. Deep. The skeptic does not just only the beliefs but his own identity in itself! How we can be a different person just something ? Do to Why would he want to hurt us just as hard? For this he must be a reason! And since he would then be: the hate.
The believer looks so bare for an explanation of the infringing conduct of his counterpart and finds it in the changeling hatred.
swings As a nice side effect of the hate charge with whatever the charge of irrationality, which will not only undermine the credibility of the skeptic. In addition, with irrational people can not, of course diskutuieren well, which conveniently frees the believer from the burden of actually times with the arguments the other side zu beschäftigen.
Aber, mein lieber Theist, in einer Diskussion über Glaubensinhalte ist ein Angriff auf die Identität unumgänglich, wenn diese Identität auf genau diesen Glaubensinhalten aufgebaut wurde. Die Verletzung der in diesem Kontext dann so genannten religiösen Gefühlen ist - leider - unvermeidbar. Sorry.
0 comments:
Post a Comment